Sunday, January 11, 2015

BYOD: Bring You Own Distraction?

I do not believe that a BYOD policy is the panacea we are looking for in education’s attempt to bring learning into the 21st century.  This does not mean, however, I think we should ban the devices entirely from the classroom.  I believe teachers should play a role in teaching students how to use technology responsibly, and in order to achieve this, students should not need to leave their devices at home.  There can be many teachable moments when students use their own devices in class, like teaching students how to use smartphone apps to make flash cards or showing them the latest app for language learning.  
My fear, however, which was illustrated in the Bloggers Beat article entitled, “Is BYOD the Answer to Our Problems or the Worst Idea Ever”, is that an official BYOD policy would make it acceptable to decrease funding to our schools in the area of technology.   As Gary S. Stager states in his response to, “Should students use their own devices in the classroom?”, “BYOD contributes to the growing narrative that education is not worthy of investment…If we placate those who slash budgets by making unreasonable compromises at the expense of children, we will find even fewer resources down the road.  We must not view education as some ‘every man for himself’ enterprise that relies on children to find loose change behind the sofa cushions.”  Other similar views on the subject point to the fact that if students were allowed to bring their own devices, the learning would be relegated to the least powerful device in the class.  How could a teacher ask students to use Powerpoint if half of the class chooses to bring in smartphones?  Or how could a teacher possibly troubleshoot 25 different devices?
BYOD is great for quick clicker activities and looking up information, but definitely not for activities that delve into the deeper levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy.  To echo my opening statement, classrooms should be open to BYOD, but it should not be the mandate.  In order for this to work, the school must first have a dedicated student wireless that is separate from what teachers or the public may have access to. I also believe that this should begin, at the earliest, in middle school when students are really getting into their devices and is a critical time to teach responsible use.  This does not mean that students should have devices on their desks at all times.  The expectation would be that students ask permission to use their device, or the teacher has given the class to use devices for a certain project.  Perhaps students are working on a poster and they want to use their cell phone to look up facts and bring up pictures to model their drawings on.  Maybe other students are using a class computer to put together a presentation, but they want to take pictures with their phone to include in the project. The teacher should model this type of use, and show how technology can be used to further learning.  Likewise, the teacher should have their phone out of sight when not being used for such purposes, as should the students.  
A lot of opponents to this policy believe that BYOD could lead to distractions, but I do not believe that needs to be the case.  Any teacher with solid classroom management skills can put procedures in place to ensure students are using their devices appropriately.  For example, the teacher could create a , “Dock your device!”, protocol, and all students would put their devices face down in the upper corner of their desk while the teacher demonstrates something or needs their attention. Any student that touches their device during this time would lose the privilege of using it in class.  Guidelines need to be strict, and follow through is absolutely necessary.  To turn a blind eye to under the desk texting can be detrimental to a functional BYOD classroom.

In summary, schools should be responsible for providing technology that enables students to fulfill the ISTE standards.  Student devices can be used to supplement this curriculum, but their use needs to be modeled and not mandated.  With this type of classroom, teachers can encourage students to use their personal devices for things other than social media and texting.  It allows students to show critical thinking skills and problem solve while under the guidance of their teacher.  If the devices are not being used appropriately, there must be consequences and follow through.  Using devices in class teaches students how to optimize their use in the real world. BYOD, however, is not the solution to creating that golden 1:1 ratio of student to computer.  And yes, student to computer.  Phones and tablets do not have the full functionality and opportunity for creativity that a computer has to offer.
Sources
Fingal, D. (2012, February 1). Is BYOD the Answer to Our Problems or the Worst Idea Ever? Learning and Leading with Technology, 5-8. 

6 comments:

  1. Like you I to felt that while students should be allowed to bring in their own devices to school to help assist it should not be forced nor expected as schools should take a leading role in making these technologies available to students. One argument I felt important to highlight was presented by David Nagel in the article, In the article Banning is Not the Answer to Mobil and Social Tools in School, he states that "Schools need to consider that equity issues in regards to BYOD policies at schools and how to address this (Nagel, 2012)."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oops wasn't done with my initial response post...

      If schools don't take a leading role in providing technology I fear that we will only perpetuate the equity issues and less fortunate students will have less opportunities to benefit from the technologies

      Delete
    2. above response was by alyssa midolo

      Delete
  2. I really like your point about how by encouraging BYOD we may be inadvertently sending the message that our schools are not worth investing in. I had not considered that this was the message we were sending. I agree it may send the every man for himself message and that can also hurt our students. Many families are struggling right now, and working in a low socio-economic district I know not all of my students would have a device available to bring. With some students always having the newest and most powerful device, other students may get embarrassed and frustrated by the old device they bring. We need to make sure that we are not creating inequality in our classrooms if we choose to use BYOD.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I understand your point that schools should have funding available so that students have technology. If the schools are not getting that though should they not use the resources they have, like students own devices, to help create learning opportunities. For example, there are great websites like Geogebra that allow students to explore concepts in math. I have used this website to allow students to discover relationships between equations and graphs. If they can not do it on their own it takes away from the experience so I allowed them to use their personal devices. If I didn't have access to that I would have just had to tell them the relationship which is much less meaningful in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wonder, though, Jacquie: Does the device dictate the level of Blooms or vice versa? What happens when we associate BYOD personal devices with less than higher order thinking activities? Is it in the possible training we could receive? What happens when we shift our thinking or shift the paradigm to include new ways of thinking and doing?

    ReplyDelete